4.0 Article

Eugenol and its synthetic analogues inhibit cell growth of human cancer cells (part I)

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE BRAZILIAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 19, 期 3, 页码 543-548

出版社

SOC BRASILEIRA QUIMICA
DOI: 10.1590/S0103-50532008000300024

关键词

eugenol; synthesis; DU-145 cancer cells; KB cancer cells; cell viability; lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) release

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Eugenol (4-allyl-2-methoxyphenol) (1) has been reported to possess antioxidant and anticancer properties. In an attempt to enhance intrinsic activity of this natural compound, some derivatives were synthesized. Eugenol was extracted from cloves oil and further, the eugenol analogues (2-6) were obtained through acetylation and nitration reactions. Eugenol (1) and its analogues (2-6) were examined by in vitro model of cancer using two human cancer cell lines: DU-145 (androgen-insensitive prostate cancer cells) and KB (oral squamous carcinoma cells). Cell viability, by tetrazolium salts assay, was measured. Lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) release was also investigated to evaluate the presence of cell toxicity as a result of cell disruption, subsequent to membrane rupture. In the examined cancer cells, all compounds showed cell-growth inhibition activity. The obtained results demonstrate that the compounds 5-allyl-3-nitrobenzene-1,2-diol (3) and 4-allyl-2-methoxy-5-nitrophenyl acetate (5) were significantly (p < 0,00 1) more active than eugenol, with IC(50) values in DU-145 cells of 19.02 x 10(-6) and 21.5 x 10(-1) mol L(-1), respectively, and in KB cells of 18.11 x 10(-6) and 21.26 x 10(-6) mol L(-1), respectively, suggesting that the presence of nitro and hydroxyl groups Could be important in the activity of these compounds. In addition, our results seem to indicate that apoptotic cell demise appears to be induced in KB and DU-145 cells. In fact, in our experimental conditions, no statistically significant increase in LDH release was observed in cancer cells treated with eugenol and its analogues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据