4.4 Article

How Does the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation Affect the Stratospheric Polar Vortex?

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
卷 71, 期 1, 页码 391-409

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JAS-D-13-096.1

关键词

Northern Hemisphere; Annular mode; Dynamics; Quasibiennial oscillation; Stratospheric circulation; Stratosphere

资金

  1. Natural Environment Research Council studentship
  2. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/H024409/1, NE/M005828/1, ncas10009] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. NERC [NE/M005828/1, NE/H024409/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The stratospheric polar vortex is weaker in the easterly phase of the quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO-E) than in the westerly phase (QBO-W), but the mechanism behind the QBO's influence is not well understood. The composite difference of the atmospheric state between QBO-E and QBO-W is found to closely resemble the structure of the northern annular mode, the leading empirical orthogonal function of stratospheric variability, including its wave components. Studies of dynamical systems indicate that many different forcings could give rise to this response, and therefore this composite difference does not provide much information about the forcing mechanism. It is argued that the full transient response of a system to an applied forcing is likely to be much more informative about the dynamics of the forcing mechanism, especially the response on time scales shorter than the dynamical time scale, which is about a week for vortex variability. It is shown that the transient response of the vortex to forcing by the QBO in a general circulation model is consistent with the proposed mechanism of Holton and Tan, indicating that this mechanism has a role in the QBO modulation of vortex strength, in contrast to the conclusions of several recent studies. This novel approach of examining the transient response to a forcing on short time scales may be useful in various other outstanding problems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据