4.4 Article

High-Resolution Simulation of the Electrification and Lightning of Hurricane Rita during the Period of Rapid Intensification

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
卷 68, 期 3, 页码 477-494

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/2010JAS3659.1

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Nuclear Security Administration of the U.S. Department of Energy under DOE [W-7405-ENG-36, LA-UR-10-04291]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a high-resolution simulation establishing relationships between lightning and eyewall convection during the rapid intensification phase of Rita will be highlighted. The simulation is an attempt to relate simulated lightning activity within strong convective events (CEs) found within the eyewall and general storm properties for a case from which high-fidelity lightning observations are available. Specifically, the analysis focuses on two electrically active eyewall CEs that had properties similar to events observed by the Los Alamos Sferic Array. The numerically simulated CEs were characterized by updraft speeds exceeding 10 m s(-1), a relatively more frequent flash rate confined in a layer between 10 and 14 km, and a propagation speed that was about 10 m s(-1) less than of the local azimuthal flow in the eyewall. Within an hour of the first CE, the simulated minimum surface pressure dropped by approximately 5 nib. Concurrent with the pulse of vertical motions was a large uptake in lightning activity. This modeled relationship between enhanced vertical motions, a noticeable pressure drop, and heightened lightning activity suggests the utility of using lightning to remotely diagnose future changes in intensity of some tropical cyclones. Furthermore, given that the model can relate lightning activity to latent heat release, this functional relationship, once validated against a derived field produced by dual-Doppler radar data, could be used in the future to initialize eyewall convection via the introduction of latent heat and/or water vapor into a hurricane model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据