4.4 Article

Estimating Atmospheric Boundary Layer Depth Using COSMIC Radio Occultation Data

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
卷 68, 期 8, 页码 1703-1713

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/2011JAS3612.1

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [ATM-0301213/CSA, ATM-0410018, AGS-0918398/CSA AGS-0939962]
  2. National Science Council in Taiwan
  3. National Space Organization in Taiwan
  4. National Science Council in the United States
  5. National Space Organization in the United States
  6. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  7. NOAA
  8. Air Force Office of Scientific Research and Space
  9. Office of Naval Research
  10. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences
  11. Directorate For Geosciences [0939962] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents an algorithm for estimating atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) depth from Global Positioning System (GPS) radio occultation (RO) data. The algorithm is applied to the Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate (COSMIC) RO data and validated using high-resolution radiosonde data from the island of St. Helena (16.0 degrees S, 5.7 degrees W), tropical (30 degrees S-30 degrees N) radiosondes collocated with RO, and European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) high-resolution global analyses. Spatial and temporal variations of the ABL depth obtained from COSMIC RO data for a 1-yr period over tropical and subtropical oceans are analyzed. The results demonstrate the capability of RO data to resolve geographical and seasonal variations of ABL height. The spatial patterns of the variations are consistent with those derived from ECMWF global analysis. However, the ABL heights derived from ECMWF global analysis, on average, are negatively biased against those estimated from COSMIC GPS RO data. These results indicate that GPS RO data can provide useful information on ABL height, which is an important parameter for weather and climate studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据