4.7 Article

Favorable formation of stereocomplex crystals in poly(L-lactide)/poly(D-lactide) blends by selective nucleation

期刊

POLYMER
卷 76, 期 -, 页码 98-104

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2015.08.056

关键词

Stereocomplex crystals; Supramolecular structure; Nucleating agent

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51203170]
  2. Beijing Training Project for the Leading Talents in S T [LJ201305, NCET-12-0601, KZ201310012014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An aryl amide derivative (TMB-5) was used to nucleate the poly(L-lactide)/poly(D-lactide) (PLLA/PDLA) blend for the first time. The effect of TMB-5 nucleating agent on the crystallization behavior of PLLA/PDLA blend was systematically investigated. The selective nucleation of stereocomplex (sc) crystals by incorporation of TMB-5 was realized under appropriate crystallization conditions. During the cooling process, various morphology of TMB-5 due to its partial or complete dissolution in the PLLA/PDLA blend melt was observed. Furthermore, an sc crystals layer on the lateral surface of TMB-5 was found. Upon cooling a PLLA/PDLA blend from 260 degrees C at rates between 2 and 100 degrees C/min, 0.5 wt%, addition of TMB-5 induced a single melting peak of sc crystals and no homocrystallization was observed in the subsequent DSC heating scan. The melting temperature of the sc crystals was found to decrease in the presence of TMB-5 from 230 to ca. 200 degrees C, which is still 20 degrees C higher than that of PLEA homopolymer. The results suggest that the supramolecular structure of the nucleating agent plays an important role in the crystallization of the PLLA/PDLA blend. The difference in solubility and recrystallization ability of TMB-5 in polymer melt results in the variation of crystallization behavior of PLLA/PDLA blend, which is correlated with the concentration of TMB-5 and crystallization conditions including the final melting temperature, annealing time and cooling rate. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据