4.3 Article

EVALUATION OF CFSR CLIMATE DATA FOR HYDROLOGIC PREDICTION IN DATA-SCARCE WATERSHEDS: AN APPLICATION IN THE BLUE NILE RIVER BASIN

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jawr.12182

关键词

hydrologic cycle; time series analysis; meteorology; CFSR; SWAT; Ethiopia; Upper Blue Nile basin; Lake Tana basin

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning (Formas)
  2. Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Data scarcity has been a huge problem in modeling the water resources of the Upper Blue Nile basin, Ethiopia. Satellite data and different statistical methods have been used to improve the quality of conventional meteorological data. This study assesses the applicability of the National Centers for Environmental Prediction's Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) climate data in modeling the hydrology of the region. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool was set up to compare the performance of CFSR weather with that of conventional weather in simulating observed streamflow at four river gauging stations in the Lake Tana basin - the upper part of the Upper Blue Nile basin. The conventional weather simulation performed satisfactorily (e. g., NSE >= 0.5) for three gauging stations, while the CFSR weather simulation performed satisfactorily for two. The simulations with CFSR and conventional weather yielded minor differences in the water balance components in all but one watershed, where the CFSR weather simulation gave much higher average annual rainfall, resulting in higher water balance components. Both weather simulations gave similar annual crop yields in the four administrative zones. Overall the simulation with the conventional weather performed better than the CFSR weather. However, in data-scarce regions such as remote parts of the Upper Blue Nile basin, CFSR weather could be a valuable option for hydrological predictions where conventional gauges are not available.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据