4.3 Article

EFFECTS OF LAND USE AND CLIMATE CHANGE ON STREAM TEMPERATURE I: DAILY FLOW AND STREAM TEMPERATURE PROJECTIONS

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jawr.12179

关键词

PRMS; SNTEMP; uncertainty; water quality; unionids; climate change

资金

  1. U.S. Geological Survey, National Climate Change and Wildlife Science Center
  2. North Carolina State University
  3. North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
  4. U.S. Geological Survey
  5. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
  6. Wildlife Management Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Freshwater mussels (order Unionida) are a highly imperiled group of organisms that are at risk from rising stream temperatures (T). There is a need to understand the potential effects of land use (LU) and climate change (CC) on stream T and have a measure of uncertainty. We used available downscaled climate projections and LU change simulations to simulate the potential effects on average daily stream T from 2020 to 2060. Monte Carlo simulations were run, and a novel technique to analyze results was used to assess changes in hydrologic and stream T response. Simulations of daily mean T were used as input to our stochastic hourly T model. CC effects were on average two orders of magnitude greater than LU impacts on mean daily stream T. LU change affected stream T primarily in headwater streams, on average up to 2.1 degrees C over short durations, and projected CC affected stream T, on average 2.1-3.3 degrees C by 2060. Daily mean flow and T ratios from Monte Carlo simulations indicated greater variance in the response of streamflow (up to 55%) to LU change than in the response of stream T (up to 9%), and greater variance in headwater stream segments compared to higher order stream segments for both streamflow and T response. Simulations indicated that combined effects of climate and LU change were not additive, suggesting a complex interaction and that forecasting long-term stream T response requires simulating CC and LU change simultaneously.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据