4.7 Article

Spectral analysis of lamellae evolution and constraining effects aided by nano-carbons: A coupled experimental and simulation study

期刊

POLYMER
卷 75, 期 -, 页码 187-198

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2015.08.032

关键词

Nano-composite fibers; Poly(vinyl alcohol); Small-angle X-ray scattering; MD; Constraining effects

资金

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) [FA9550-11-1-0153]
  2. National Science Foundation [NSF CMMI-1351657]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of filler concentration on processing-structure-property relationships in polymer composites with low nano-carbon (nC) loadings (<1 wt%) have been investigated. Fibrillar structure was observed under scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and confirmed quantitatively by X-ray measurements. A onedimensional correlation function analysis of small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) data is used to track development for both the crystalline and amorphous regions in lamellae of the polymer matrix as a function of filler concentration and drawing temperature. Analysis for the filled poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) fibers demonstrates that the presence of the carbon nanochips (CNC) influences the organization and formation of lamellae stacking, leading to variations in composite fiber grain structure. An increase in grains per unit fibril volume and higher degree of chain orientation along the fiber axis was observed for the composites as compared to the control samples. Based on the fibrillar and lamellae dimensions of final stage fibers, mechanical simulations by finite element method (FEM) approaches were conducted on polymeric fibrils. Compared with molecular dynamics (MD) results, higher polymer constraining effects were related to increase of nano-particle inclusions. This work demonstrates the significance of using spectroscopy analysis and coupled simulation methods to provide detail information regarding the propertyestructure relationship in nano-composite fibers. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据