4.3 Article

TWENTY YEARS OF NEW ZEALAND'S NATIONAL RIVERS WATER QUALITY NETWORK: BENEFITS OF CAREFUL DESIGN AND CONSISTENT OPERATION

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00554.x

关键词

water quality; monitoring; rivers; nutrients; microbial pollution; visual clarity; benthic algae/periphyton; macro-invertebrates; environmental sampling; quality assurance; time series analysis; load modeling; New Zealand

资金

  1. NIWA [CRCA092]
  2. New Zealand Values, Monitoring and Outcomes science programme [CO9X1003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reviews New Zealand's National Rivers Water Quality Network (NRWQN), which is now in its third decade of monitoring. The NRWQN is noteworthy for being operationally stable throughout its history, and the resulting consistency is increasingly valuable for detecting water quality trends and for anchoring temporary special purpose monitoring campaigns. The NRWQN was carefully designed following considerable effort to learn from monitoring experiences elsewhere. Monthly visits are made to 77 sites (all near hydrometric stations) on 35 river systems that cumulatively drain about one half of the national landscape. Core (routinely measured) variables are: conductivity, pH, temperature, dissolved oxygen, visual clarity, turbidity, colored dissolved organic matter, fecal indicator bacteria, and different forms of nitrogen and phosphorus (italics indicate field measurements). Associated benthic biological monitoring comprises monthly visual assessment of periphyton and annual sampling for macro-invertebrates. We overview the conception, design, initiation, and operational history of the NRWQN, and highlight the diverse applications of its datasets including numerous scientific applications, national-scale modeling of material fluxes, and state-of-environment reporting and practical water management at both regional and national scale. The qualified success of the NRWQN can probably be attributed to careful (and parsimonious) design and consistent operation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据