4.6 Article

Semiparametric Regression Using Variational Approximations

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION
卷 114, 期 528, 页码 1765-1777

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2018.1518235

关键词

Generalized additive models; Mixed models; Penalized splines; Smoothing parameter

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Semiparametric regression offers a flexible framework for modeling nonlinear relationships between a response and covariates. A prime example are generalized additive models (GAMs) where splines (say) are used to approximate nonlinear functional components in conjunction with a quadratic penalty to control for overfitting. Estimation and inference are then generally performed based on the penalized likelihood, or under a mixed model framework. The penalized likelihood framework is fast but potentially unstable, and choosing the smoothing parameters needs to be done externally using cross-validation, for instance. The mixed model framework tends to be more stable and offers a natural way for choosing the smoothing parameters, but for nonnormal responses involves an intractable integral. In this article, we introduce a new framework for semiparametric regression based on variational approximations (VA). The approach possesses the stability and natural inference tools of the mixed model framework, while achieving computation times comparable to using penalized likelihood. Focusing on GAMs, we derive fully tractable variational likelihoods for some common response types. We present several features of the VA framework for inference, including a variational information matrix for inference on parametric components, and a closed-form update for estimating the smoothing parameter. We demonstrate the consistency of the VA estimates, and an asymptotic normality result for the parametric component of the model. Simulation studies show the VA framework performs similarly to and sometimes better than currently available software for fitting GAMs. for this article are available online.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据