4.6 Article

Optimal Detection of Changepoints With a Linear Computational Cost

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION
卷 107, 期 500, 页码 1590-1598

出版社

AMER STATISTICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2012.737745

关键词

Dynamic programming; PELT; Segmentation; Structural change

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)/Shell Research Ltd.
  2. Research Councils UK Energy Programme [EP/I016368/1]
  3. EPSRC [EP/I016368/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/I016368/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this article, we consider the problem of detecting multiple changepoints in large datasets. Our focus is on applications where the number of changepoints will increase as we collect more data: for example, in genetics as we analyze larger regions of the genome, or in finance as we observe time series over longer periods. We consider the common approach of detecting changepoints through minimizing a cost function over possible numbers and locations of changepoints. This includes several established procedures for detecting changing points, such as penalized likelihood and minimum description length. We introduce a new method for finding the minimum of such cost functions and hence the optimal number and location of changepoints that has a computational cost, which, under mild conditions, is linear in the number of observations. This compares favorably with existing methods for the same problem whose computational cost can be quadratic or even cubic. In simulation studies, we show that our new method can be orders of magnitude faster than these alternative exact methods. We also compare with the binary segmentation algorithm for identifying changepoints, showing that the exactness of our approach can lead to substantial improvements in the accuracy of the inferred segmentation of the data. This article has supplementary materials available online.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据