4.6 Article

Information Ratio Test for Model Misspecification in Quasi-Likelihood Inference

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION
卷 107, 期 497, 页码 205-213

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2011.645785

关键词

Correlation structure selection; Estimating functions; Generalized estimating equations; Homoscedasticity; Information unbiasedness; Perturbation

资金

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [DMS 0904177]
  2. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1208939, 0904177] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Division Of Mathematical Sciences [1208939, 0904177] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this article, we focus on the circumstances in quasi-likelihood inference that the estimation accuracy of mean structure parameters is guaranteed by correct specification of the first moment, but the estimation efficiency could be diminished due to misspecification of the second moment. We propose an information ratio (IR) statistic to test for model misspecification of the variance/covariance structure through a comparison between two forms of information matrix: the negative sensitivity matrix and the variability matrix. We establish asymptotic distributions of the proposed IR test statistics. We also suggest an approximation to the asymptotic distribution of the IR statistic via a perturbation resampling method. Moreover, we propose a selection criterion based on the IR test to select the best fitting variance/covariance structure from a class of candidates. Through simulation studies, it is shown that the IR statistic provides a powerful statistical tool to detect different scenarios of misspecification of the variance/covariance structures. In addition, the IR test as well as the proposed model selection procedure shows substantial improvement over some of the existing statistical methods. The IR-based model selection procedure is illustrated by analyzing the Madras Longitudinal Schizophrenia data. Appendices are included in the supplemental materials, which are available online.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据