4.7 Article

Randomized Clinical Trial of Dialysate Cooling and Effects on Brain White Matter

期刊

出版社

AMER SOC NEPHROLOGY
DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2013101086

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hemodialysis is associated with significant circulatory stress that could produce recurrent and cumulative ischemic insults to multiple organs, such as the brain. We aimed to characterize hemodialysis-induced brain injury by longitudinally studying the effects of hemodialysis on brain white matter microstructure and further examine if the use of cooled dialysate could provide protection against hemodialysis-associated brain injury. In total, 73 patients on incident hemodialysis starting within 6 months were randomized to dialyze with a dialysate temperature of either 37 degrees C or 0.5 degrees C below the core body temperature and followed up for 1 year. Brain white matter microstructure was studied by diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging at baseline and follow-up (38 patients available for paired analysis). lntradialytic hemodynamic stress was quantified using the extrema points analysis model. Patients on hemodialysis exhibited a pattern of ischemic brain injury (increased fractional anisotropy and reduced radial diffusivity). Cooled dialysate improved hemodynamic tolerability, and changes in brain white matter were associated with hemodynamic instability (higher mean arterial pressure extrema points frequencies were associated with higher fractional anisotropy [peak r=0.443, P<0.03] and lower radial diffusivity [peak r=-0.439, P<0.02]). Patients who dialyzed at 0.5 degrees C below core body temperature exhibited complete protection against white matter changes at 1 year. Our data suggest that hemodialysis results in significant brain injury and that improvement in hemodynamic tolerability achieved by using cooled dialysate is effective at abrogating these effects. This intervention can be delivered without additional cost and is universally applicable.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据