4.7 Article

Renal Progenitor Cells Contribute to Hyperplastic Lesions of Podocytopathies and Crescentic Glomerulonephritis

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY
卷 20, 期 12, 页码 2593-2603

出版社

AMER SOC NEPHROLOGY
DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2009020132

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Community [FP7/2007-2013]
  2. European Research Council (ERC) [223007, 205027]
  3. Dutch Kidney Foundation [NSN 06.2191]
  4. Tuscany Ministry of Health
  5. Fondazione Cariplo, Milan, Italy [2007-5549]
  6. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro
  7. Federazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro
  8. Collegio Ghislieri

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glomerular injury can involve excessive proliferation of glomerular epithelial cells, resulting in crescent formation and obliteration of Bowman's space. The origin of these hyperplastic epithelial cells in different glomerular disorders is controversial. Renal progenitors localized to the inner surface of Bowman's capsule can regenerate podocytes, but whether dysregulated proliferation of these progenitors contributes to crescent formation is unknown. In this study, we used confocal microscopy, laser capture microdissection, and real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR to demonstrate that hypercellular lesions of different podocytopathies and crescentic glomerulonephritis consist of three distinct populations: CD133(+)CD24(+) podocalyxin (PDX)(-)nestin(-) renal progenitors, CD133(+)CD24(+) PDX(+)nestin(+) transitional cells, and CD133(-)CD24(-)PDX(+)nestin(+) differentiated podocytes. In addition, TGF-beta induced CD133(+)CD24(+) progenitors to produce extracellular matrix, and these were the only cells to express the proliferation marker Ki67. Taken together, these results suggest that glomerular hyperplastic lesions derive from the proliferation of renal progenitors at different stages of their differentiation toward mature podocytes, providing an explanation for the pathogenesis of hyperplastic lesions in podocytopathies and crescentic glomerulonephritis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据