4.7 Article

Activation of adenosine 2A receptors preserves structure and function of podocytes

期刊

出版社

AMER SOC NEPHROLOGY
DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2007030276

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL037942, HL37942] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK56223, R00 DK077444, R44 DK058413, DK62324, DK58413, R01 DK056223, R00 DK077444-04, K99 DK077444, R01 DK062324, R41 DK058413, R00 DK077444-03, K99 DK077444-02, K99 DK077444-01A1] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL037942, R55HL037942] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R00DK077444, R01DK062324, R41DK058413, R44DK058413, K99DK077444, R01DK056223] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adenosine 2A receptor (A(2A)R) activation was recently shown to be renoprotective in diabetic nephropathy. A(2A)R are found in glomeruli and have been shown to associate with the podocyte cytoskeletal protein alpha-actinin-4, but the effect of their activation on podocyte structure and function is unknown. Podocyte injury was induced in C5713L/6 mice with puromycin aminonucleoside, and the selective A(2A)R agonist ATL313 was found to attenuate the resulting albuminuria and foot process fusion. The selective A(2A)R antagonist ZM241385 reversed the effects of ATL313. In vitro, A(2A)R mRNA and protein were expressed in a conditionally immortalized podocyte cell line, and A(2A)R-like immunoreactivity co-localized with the actin cytoskeleton. Treatment with ATL313 also blocked the increased podocyte permeability to albumin and disruption of the actin cytoskeleton that accompanied puromycin aminonucleoside-induced injury in vitro. ATL313 was ineffective, however, in the presence of the A(2A)R antagonist and in A(2A)R-deficient podocytes. It was concluded that A(2A)R activation reduces glomerular proteinuria, at least in part, by preserving the normal structure of podocyte foot processes, slit diaphragms, and actin cytoskeleton.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据