3.9 Review

Human renalase: a review of its biology, function, and implications for hypertension

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jash.2012.09.002

关键词

Renalase; catecholamines; hypertension; myocardial infarction; heart failure; acute kidney injury

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Renalase is a novel flavoprotein, highly expressed in kidney and heart, which metabolizes catecholamines and catecholamine-like substances via a superoxide (O2(-))-dependent mechanism using nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) as a cofactor. Its mechanism of action is distinct from that of monoaminooxidases A and B, because it oxidizes catecholamines (epinephrine> >L-DOPA>dopamine = norepinephrine) to aminochrome, and the reaction rate increases similar to 4- to 6-fold in presence of NADH. Tissue and plasma renalase levels are decreased in animal models of chronic kidney disease, and renalase deficiency is associated with increased blood pressure and elevated circulating catecholamines. Renalase plasma levels, measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, are reported to be similar to 5-fold higher in patients with end-stage renal disease than in normal control subjects. They were also increased in kidney and heart transplant recipients, and inversely correlated with estimated glomerular filtration rate. Renalase has potential therapeutic applications. Experimental models demonstrate that the chronic administration of renalase decreases ambulatory blood pressure and prevents the development of cardiac hypertrophy in rats, and that its acute administration decreases ischemic acute kidney injury in mice. Here we provide a detailed review of renalase biology including its mechanism of action, secretion into blood, interaction with the renal dopamine and epinephrine system, and early studies evaluating its association with outcomes related to hypertension and target-organ injury. J Am Soc Hypertens 2012;6(6):417-426. Published by Elsevier Inc on behalf of American Society of Hypertension.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据