4.5 Article

The Cardioprotective Role of Probucol Against Anthracycline and Trastuzumab-Mediated Cardiotoxicity

期刊

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2011.01.018

关键词

Cardiomyopathy; Cardioprotection; Doxorubicin; Probucol; Trastuzumab

资金

  1. Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation
  2. St. Boniface General Hospital and Research Foundation
  3. Manitoba Health Research Council
  4. Health Sciences Centre Research Foundation
  5. Woman's Health Research Foundation of Canada
  6. Manitoba Medical College Foundation
  7. St. Boniface Hospital and Research Foundation
  8. Heart and Stroke Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Although the combination of doxorubicin (Dox) and trastuzumab (Trz) reduces breast cancer progression and recurrence, it is limited by significant cardiotoxic side effects. Little is known about the utility of antioxidants in the prevention of this drug-induced cardiomyopathy. The aim of the study was to determine whether the antioxidant probucol (Prob) would be useful in attenuating Dox and Trz-mediated cardiotoxicity. Methods: A total of 114 mice were randomized to treatment with Trz, Dox, or Dox+Trz. Within each arm, mice received prophylactic treatment with placebo or Prob. Serial murine echocardiography with tissue Doppler imaging was performed daily for 10 days. At 10 days posttreatment, the hearts were removed for histopathologic and Western blot analyses. Results: Left ventricular cavity dimensions and systolic parameters were preserved in mice prophylactically treated with Prob after the administration of Dox+Trz. Although the combination of Dox+Trz demonstrated > 80% mortality at day 5, prophylactic treatment with Prob reduced mortality to 40% at day 10. There was decreased histologic evidence of cardiac damage and reduced apoptosis due to Dox+Trz in mice pretreated with Prob. Conclusion: The cardiotoxic effects of Dox+Trz are partially attenuated by the prophylactic administration of the antioxidant Prob. (J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2011; 24:699-705.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据