4.5 Article

Two-Dimensional Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography of the Left Atrium: Feasibility and Regional Contraction and Relaxation Differences in Normal Subjects

期刊

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2008.12.017

关键词

Left atrial contractility; Left atrial function; Left atrial strain; Strain imaging; Two-dimensional speckle tracking

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq), Brazil.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Increased left atrial (LA) size and reduced global contractility are related to adverse cardiac events. The potential incremental value of assessing regional LA contractility is unknown. To assess the feasibility of measuring this variable angle, independent 2-dimensional speckle-tracking strain echocardiography (2D-SpTr) was used to measure regional LA strain (3) and strain rate (SR) in normal individuals of various ages. Methods: From standard apical views, 2D-SpTr was used on 84 normal subjects to measure longitudinal velocity, 3, and SR in 13 LA segmental regions. The values obtained from the different atrial regions were compared with each other and corresponding LA volumes before and after LA contraction. Results: Regional LA 3 and SR could be measured in 77 of 84 normal subjects (94%). A consistent pattern of differences in LA regional function was noted with the annular regions, and particularly the inferior wall having a larger average peak velocity and 3 and SR values in comparison with the mid and superior LA segments. Peak 3 and SR during LA contraction had only a modest correlation with LA volumes. Conclusion: The angle-independent technique of 2D-SpTr tracking can analyze regional LA 3 and SR in 94% of normal subjects. Regional differences in LA contractility are consistently present. The annular regions, and especially the inferior wall have the highest values for LA 3 and SR. The significance of these findings and their possible use in identifying disease states will require further study. (J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009; 22: 299-305.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据