4.5 Article

Left ventricular longitudinal and radial synchrony and their determinants in healthy subjects

期刊

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2008.05.002

关键词

echocardiography; left ventricle; synchrony; tissue Doppler imaging; 2D speckle tracking

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The reference values and impact of physiologic variables on echocardiographic quantification of left ventricular (LV) synchrony in a large series of healthy persons are unknown. This study prospectively investigated the impact of age, gender, and other physiologic parameters on LV longitudinal and radial synchrony. Methods: LV longitudinal systolic and diastolic synchrony using tissue Doppler imaging were measured as the standard deviation of times to 12 regional peak myocardial systolic Sm (SDTs) and early diastolic Em (SDTe) velocities in 122 healthy volunteers (age 19-68 years, 64 men). By using 2-dimensional speckle tracking, radial synchrony was measured as the standard deviation of times to 6 regional peak strain (SDTr epsilon) in the short-axis papillary muscle level. Longitudinal systolic synchrony was also measured as the standard deviation of times to 12 regional peak strain (SDTl epsilon). Results: The mean QRS duration and LV ejection fraction were 87 +/- 12 msec and 61% +/- 5.5%, respectively. The mean SDTs and SDTe were 37.1 +/- 17.4 msec and 17.3 +/- 6.7 msec, respectively. Gender and the mean Sm velocity from the 6 basal LV segments were independent predictors of SDTs, whereas the isovolumic relaxation time and mean Em velocity independently predicted SDTe. The mean SDTr epsilon was 19.2 +/- 14.6 msec. SDTr epsilon did not correlate with any clinical or echocardiographic parameters. The mean SDTl epsilon was 40.4 +/- 11.8 msec. Isovolumic relaxation time, pulmonary S/ D ratio, and mean Sm independently predicted SDTl epsilon. There was no correlation between LV longitudinal and radial synchrony. Intraobserver and interobserver variability analyses showed the highest correlation for SDTs compared with SDTr epsilon and SDTl epsilon. Conclusion: This study establishes normal reference ranges for LV systolic and diastolic synchrony measured with tissue Doppler velocity-based and 2-dimensional speckle tracking-based methods in a large group of healthy subjects of both genders across a wide age group. SDTs is gender specific and dependent on global LV systolic function, whereas SDTe is dependent on global LV diastolic function. Two-dimensional speckle-derived radial synchrony is independent of any clinical and echocardiographic variables but has higher intraobserver and interobserver variability compared with SDTs. LV longitudinal synchrony does not correlate with radial synchrony.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据