4.5 Article

Assessment of longitudinal and radial ventricular dyssynchrony in ischemic and nonischemic chronic Systolic heart failure: A two-dimensional echocardiographic speckle-tracking strain study

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2007.05.031

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Current guidelines recommend a QRS greater than or equal to 120 milliseconds to select candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy. However, ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathies are two different entities and they might be selected following different approaches. We sought, thus, after a validation the new 2-dimensional (2D) speckle-tracking strain (STS) against color Doppler tissue imaging (DTI)-strain (S) to compare the different correlation between electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony (DYS) in ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathies. Methods: We measured: (1) QRS duration; (2) mechanical interventricular DYS (the difference between preaortic and prepulmonary ejection times); (3) left intraventricular DYS (the SD of time-to-peak of longitudinal DTI-S); and (4) longitudinal and radial 2D-STS in the basal and middle segments of lateral and septal left ventricular walls in 95 patients with chronic heart failure caused by ischemic (n = 49) or nonischemic (n = 46) heart disease. Twelve healthy control subjects were also explored. Results: Mechanical interventricular DYS was correlated (DTI-S: P < .001) with QRS-duration, but not in ischemic heart disease. DTI-S and 2D-STS measurements were correlated (R = 0.6, P < .001) in the overall population. Longitudinal 2D-S DYS was correlated with QRS duration in patients with nonischemic, (P = .003) but not with ischemic heart disease, whereas radial 2D-S DYS was correlated with QRS width in both subgroups (r = 0.48, P = .003, and r = 0.43, P = .003, respectively). Conclusions: The profile of DYS is influenced by the underlying cause of heart failure. The 2D-STS is a new tool for cardiac DYS assessment. Its ability to measure both longitudinal and radial intraventricular DYS is noteworthy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据