4.5 Article

Degree of Ionization in MALDI of Peptides: Thermal Explanation for the Gas-Phase Ion Formation

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13361-012-0406-y

关键词

Degree of ionization; Peptide; MALDI; Ion formation mechanism; Laser fluence dependence; Preformed ion; Gas phase proton transfer

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Korea government (MEST) [305-20110059]
  3. Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology, Republic of Korea
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2006-0093849] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Degree of ionization (DI) in matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) was measured for five peptides using alpha-cyano-4-hydroxycinnanmic acid (CHCA) as the matrix. DIs were low 10(-4) for peptides and 10(-7) for CHCA. Total number of ions (i.e., peptide plus matrix) was the same regardless of peptides and their concentration, setting the number of gas-phase ions generated from a pure matrix as the upper limit to that of peptide ions. Positively charged cluster ions were too weak to support the ion formation via such ions. The total number of gas-phase ions generated by MALDI, and that from pure CHCA, was unaffected by the laser pulse energy, invalidating laser-induced ionization of matrix molecules as the mechanism for the primary ion formation. Instead, the excitation of matrix by laser is simply a way of supplying thermal energy to the sample. Accepting strong Coulomb attraction felt by cations in a solid sample, we propose three hypotheses for gas-phase peptide ion formation. In Hypothesis 1, they originate from the dielectrically screened peptide ions in the sample. In Hypothesis 2, the preformed peptide ions are released as part of neutral ion pairs, which generate gas-phase peptide ions via reaction with matrix-derived cations. In Hypothesis 3, neutral peptides released by ablation get protonated via reaction with matrix-derived cations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据