4.5 Article

Separation of Different Ion Structures in Atmospheric Pressure Photoionization-Ion Mobility Spectrometry-Mass Spectrometry (APPI-IMS-MS)

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jasms.2010.04.018

关键词

-

资金

  1. Academy of Finland [114132, 122018]
  2. Academy of Finland (AKA) [122018, 114132, 122018, 114132] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates how positive ion atmospheric pressure photoionization-ion mobility spectrometry-mass spectrometry (APPI-IMS-MS) can be used to produce different ionic forms of an analyte and how these can be separated. When hexane:toluene (9:1) is used as a solvent, 2,6-di-tert-butylpyridine (2,6-DtBPyr) and 2,6-di-tert-4-methylpyridine (2,6-DtB-4-MPyr) efficiently produce radical cations [M](+) and protonated [M + H](+) molecules, whereas, when the sample solvent is hexane, protonated molecules are mainly formed. Interestingly, radical cations drift slower in the drift tube than the protonated molecules. It was observed that an oxygen adduct ion, [M + O-2](+), which was clearly seen in the mass spectra for hexane:toluene (9:1) solutions, shares the same mobility with radical cations, [M](+). Therefore, the observed mobility order is most likely explained by oxygen adduct formation, i.e., the radical cation forming a heavier adduct. For pyridine and 2-tert-butylpyridine, only protonated molecules could be efficiently formed in the conditions used. For 1- and 2-naphthol it was observed that in hexane the protonated molecule typically had a higher intensity than the radical cation, whereas in hexane:toluene (9:1) the radical cation [M](+-) typically had a higher intensity than the protonated molecule [M + H](+) Interestingly, the latter drifts slower than the radical cation [M](+-), which is the opposite of the drift pattern seen for 2,6-DtBPyr and 2,6-DtB-4-MPyr. (J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 2010, 21, 1565-1572) (C) 2010 American Society for Mass Spectrometry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据