4.0 Article

Recovering substance-impaired pharmacists' views regarding occupational risks for addiction

期刊

出版社

AMER PHARMACEUTICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1331/JAPhA.2012.10214

关键词

Substance abuse; impaired health professionals; pharmacists

资金

  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) [R01-DA20791, T32-DA07313-10]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To better understand the occupational risks for substance use disorders among pharmacists and possibilities for improved prevention. Design: Descriptive, nonexperimental, cross-sectional study. Setting: A southeastern state from December 2008 to April 2009. Participants: 32 participants (72.7% men) from the impaired professionals monitoring groups in the geographic regions within the state that had the greatest number of physicians, pharmacists, and allied health professionals currently under monitoring contracts for substance use disorders. Intervention: Guided group discussions regarding substance use among health care providers. Main outcome measures: Persistent occupational risks for development of a substance use disorder among pharmacists. Results: Several occupational hazards unique to the pharmacy profession might contribute to the problem of substance use disorders among some members of this population, including increased access to potent drugs of abuse, a stressful/unpleasant working environment, a culture that unofficially condones medication diversion, lack of education related to addiction, and lack of support for individuals seeking treatment. Conclusion: These results have important implications for the education of student pharmacists, the continuing education of licensed pharmacists, and the management of pharmacies in which these individuals work. Given the potential occupational risks for substance abuse associated with the pharmacy profession, additional training, monitoring, changes to the work environment, and increased confidential access to treatment may be needed to safeguard pharmacy professionals and the communities they serve.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据