4.3 Article

Flaking as a Pretreatment for Enzyme-Assisted Aqueous Extraction Processing of Soybeans

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OIL CHEMISTS SOCIETY
卷 87, 期 12, 页码 1507-1515

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1007/s11746-010-1626-6

关键词

Enzyme-assisted aqueous extraction; Oil extraction; Protein extraction; Flaking; Soybeans; Emulsion stability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soybean moisture content (7.2-12.8%) and conditioning temperature (51-79 degrees C) during flaking were evaluated to determine their effects on oil and protein extraction and oil distribution among fractions produced in enzyme-assisted aqueous extraction processing (EAEP). Extractions were performed by using two-stage countercurrent EAEP at a 1:6 solids-to-liquid ratio with 0.5% protease (wt/g extruded flakes) at pH 9.0 and 50 degrees C for I h. Oil extraction improved when using soybeans with moisture contents ranging from 8.0 to 12.0% for flaking but was not affected by conditioning temperature. Oil extraction was reduced when moving away from 10% moisture with the lowest values at 7.2 and 12.8% moisture. Free oil extraction increased as soybean moisture content increased from 7.2 to 12.8% although total oil extraction was reduced at 12.8% moisture. Higher (79 degrees C) and lower conditioning temperatures (51 degrees C) improved free oil extraction and reduced cream emulsion formation. Skim oil content was not significantly affected by soybean moisture content and the conditioning temperature, although an undesirable high oil content in the skim was observed at 8% moisture and at 55 degrees C. The cream with a high oil yield was easily demulsified compared with cream containing a low oil yield (95 vs. 76.5% de-emulsification). Due to differences in cream stability, similar oil recoveries (78-80%) were obtained for treatments yielding creams with either low or high oil yields. Mean protein extraction of 95% was achieved for all treatments and was not significantly affected by soybean moisture content at flaking or conditioning temperature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据