4.3 Article

Characterization of Olive-Leaf Phenolics by ESI-MS and Evaluation of their Antioxidant Capacities by the CAT Assay

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OIL CHEMISTS SOCIETY
卷 86, 期 12, 页码 1215-1225

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1007/s11746-009-1452-x

关键词

Olive leaves; Antioxidant; Phenolics; Oleuropein; Verbascoside; Quercetin; Bioconversion; CAT assay

资金

  1. Albetaan
  2. European Union [E05D055786CO]
  3. PRAD [05-14]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Olive leaves are a very abundant vegetable material containing various phenolic compounds, such as secoiridoids and flavonoids, that are expected to exert strong antioxidant capacity. However, little is known about the variation of olive-leaf phenolic composition during maturation and its influence on antioxidant capacity. To answer this question, young and mature Olea Europaea L. leaves were submitted to successive extraction with dichloromethane, ethyl acetate, and methanol, then characterized by ESI-MS. It appeared that mature olive-leaf extracts contained higher levels of verbascoside isomers and glucosylated forms of luteolin, while young ones presented higher contents of oleuropein, ligstroside, and flavonoid aglycones. Moreover, antioxidant capacity evaluation using our newly developed conjugated autoxidizable triene assay showed that, in a lipid-based emulsified system, this phenolic composition variation leads to a change in the ability of extracts to counteract lipid oxidation. Mature olive-leaf extracts exhibit higher antioxidant capacity than young olive-leaf extracts. This result enables us to hypothesize that two main bioconversion scenarios may occur during maturation of olive leaves, which could explain changes observed in antioxidant capacity: (1) a bioconversion of oleuropein and ligstroside into verbascoside isomers and oleuroside, and (2) a bioconversion of flavonoid aglycones into glucosylated forms of luteolin. Finally, this study leads to a better understanding of the relationship between phenolic profile and antioxidant capacity of olive leaves.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据