4.7 Article

Protein Supplementation Improves Physical Performance in Frail Elderly People: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2012.07.005

关键词

Sarcopenia; frailty; aging; nutrition; muscle function

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Protein supplementation has been proposed as an effective dietary strategy to increase skeletal muscle mass and improve physical performance in frail elderly people. Our objective was to assess the impact of 24 weeks of dietary protein supplementation on muscle mass, strength, and physical performance in frail elderly people. Design/setting/participants: A total of 65 frail elderly subjects were included and randomly allocated to either daily protein or placebo supplementation (15 g protein at breakfast and lunch). Measurements: Skeletal muscle mass (DXA), muscle fiber size (muscle biopsy), strength (1-RM), and physical performance (SPPB) were assessed at baseline, and after 12 and 24 weeks of dietary intervention. Results: Skeletal muscle mass did not change in the protein-(from 45.8 +/- 1.7 to 45.8 +/- 1.7 kg) or placebo-supplemented group (from 46.7 +/- 1.7 to 46.6 +/- 1.7 kg) following 24 weeks of intervention (P > .05). In accordance, type I and II muscle fiber size did not change over time (P > .05). Muscle strength increased significantly in both groups (P < .01), with leg extension strength tending to increase to a greater extent in the protein (57 +/- 5 to 68 +/- 5 kg) compared with the placebo group (57 +/- 5 to 63 +/- 5 kg) (treatment x time interaction effect: P = .059). Physical performance improved significantly from 8.9 +/- 0.6 to 10.0 +/- 0.6 points in the protein group and did not change in the placebo group (from 7.8 +/- 0.6 to 7.9 +/- 0.6 points) (treatment x time interaction effect: P = .02). Conclusion: Dietary protein supplementation improves physical performance, but does not increase skeletal muscle mass in frail elderly people. Copyright (C) 2012 - American Medical Directors Association, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据