4.6 Review

Systematic Review of Outcomes from Home-Based Primary Care Programs for Homebound Older Adults

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
卷 62, 期 12, 页码 2243-2251

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jgs.13088

关键词

home-based primary care; house calls; homebound older adults

资金

  1. Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care BRIDGES
  2. MOHLTC Innovations Fund grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectivesTo describe the effect of home-based primary care for homebound older adults on individual, caregiver, and systems outcomes. DesignA systematic review of home-based primary care interventions for community-dwelling older adults (aged 65) using the Cochrane, PubMed, and MEDLINE databases from the earliest available date through March 15, 2014. Studies were included if the house calls visitor was the ongoing primary care provider and if the intervention measured emergency department visits, hospitalizations, hospital beds days of care, long-term care admissions, or long-term care bed days of care. SettingHome-based primary care programs. ParticipantsHomebound community-dwelling older adults (N=46,154). MeasurementsEmergency department visits, hospitalizations, hospital bed days of care, long-term care admissions, long-term care bed days of care, costs, program design, and individual and caregiver quality of life and satisfaction with care. ResultsOf 357 abstracts identified, nine met criteria for review. The nine interventions were all based in North America, with five emerging from the Veterans Affairs system. Eight of nine programs demonstrated substantial effects on at least one inclusion outcome, with seven programs affecting two outcomes. Six interventions shared three core program components: interprofessional care teams, regular interprofessional care meetings, and after-hours support. ConclusionSpecifically designed home-based primary care programs may substantially affect individual, caregiver and systems outcomes. Adherence to the core program components identified in this review could guide the development and spread of these programs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据