4.6 Article

Epidemiology of Restricting Fatigue in Older Adults: The Precipitating Events Project

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
卷 62, 期 3, 页码 476-481

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jgs.12685

关键词

aging; fatigue; epidemiology; restricted activity; cohort study

资金

  1. National Institute on Aging at the National Institutes of Health [R37AG017560, K24AG021507, K07AG043587]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectivesTo estimate the rate of restricting fatigue in community-living older adults and to determine whether the rates differ according to age, sex, race, physical frailty, and depression. DesignProspective cohort study. SettingGreater New Haven, Connecticut. ParticipantsNondisabled community-living older men and women aged 70 and older (N=754). MeasurementsRestricting fatigue was defined as staying in bed for at least half the day and/or cutting down on one's usual activities because of fatigue for 3 consecutive months or longer. Physical frailty was defined on the basis of slow gait speed, and depression was assessed using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. ResultsDuring a median follow-up of 111months, the cumulative incidence of restricting fatigue was 31.1% for men and 42.1% for women. The overall incidence rate of restricting fatigue was 6.7 per 1,000 person-months (7.8 for women and 4.4 for men, P<.001), which did not differ according to race. Rates were higher in persons who were physically frail than those who were not (P<.001), in those who were depressed than those who were not (P<.001), and in persons aged 75 to 79 and 80 to 84 than those aged 70 to 74 (both P<.01) but not in those aged 85 and older. Of the 459 episodes of restricting fatigue, the median duration was 3months, which did not differ according to age, sex, race, physical frailty, or depression. ConclusionRestricting fatigue is common in community-living older adults. Women, individuals aged 75 to 84, and individuals with physical frailty or depression had higher rates of restricting fatigue than their respective counterparts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据