4.6 Article

Exclusion of Older Adults from Ongoing Clinical Trials About Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
卷 61, 期 5, 页码 734-738

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jgs.12215

关键词

type 2 diabetes mellitus; ageism; clinical trial; registries; research subject selection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To assess the extent of exclusion of older individuals from ongoing clinical trials regarding type 2 diabetes mellitus. Design Cohort study. Setting World Health Organization Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Participants Using the Participation of the Elderly in Clinical Trials methodology, data from ongoing clinical trials on type 2 diabetes mellitus were extracted from the platform on July 31, 2011. Measurements Proportion of trials excluding individuals using an arbitrary upper age limit or other exclusion criteria that might indirectly cause limited recruitment of older individuals. Exclusion criteria were classified as justified or poorly justified. Results Of 440 trials investigating treatments for type 2 diabetes mellitus, 289 (65.7%) excluded individuals using an arbitrary upper age limit. Such exclusion was significantly more common in trials with calculated sample sizes of less than 100 subjects (73.6% vs 59.5%; P=.002). Exclusion for comorbidity was present in 338 trials (76.8%); this exclusion was poorly justified in 236 trials (53.6%). Exclusion for polypharmacy (29.5% of trials), cognitive impairment (18.4%), short life expectancy (8.9%), and other poorly justified exclusion criteria that could limit the inclusion of older individuals was also present. Only six trials (1.4%) were designed specifically to study older adults. Conclusion Despite the recommendations of international regulatory agencies, exclusion of older individuals from ongoing trials regarding type 2 diabetes mellitus is frequenthigher than reported for other age-related diseases. This exclusion limits the value of the evidence that clinicians use when treating old, frail, complex patients with diabetes mellitus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据