4.6 Article

All-Cause 1-, 5-, and 10-Year Mortality in Elderly People According to Activities of Daily Living Stage

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
卷 60, 期 3, 页码 485-492

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03867.x

关键词

activities of daily living; staging; mortality; risk factors

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [AG032420 -01A1]
  2. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research [T32-HD-007425]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES: To examine the independent association between five stages of activities of daily living (ADLs) and mortality after accounting for known diagnostic and sociodemographic risk factors. DESIGN: For five stages of ADLs (0 to IV), determined according to the severity and pattern of ADL limitations, unadjusted life expectancies and adjusted associations with mortality were estimated using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. SETTING: Community, PARTICIPANTS: Nine thousand four hundred forty-seven participants aged 70 and older from the second Longitudinal Study of Aging. MEASUREMENTS: One-, 5-, and 10-year survival and time to death. RESULTS: Median life expectancy was 10.6 years for participants with no ADL limitations and 6.5, 5.1, 3.8, and 1.6 years for those at ADL stages I, II, III, and IV, respectively. The sociodemographic-and diagnosticadjusted hazard of death at 1 year was five times as great at stage IV as at stage 0 (hazard ratio = 5.6, 95% confidence interval = 3.8-8.3). The associations between ADL stage and mortality declined over time but remained statistically significant at 5 and 10 years. CONCLUSION: ADL stage continued to explain mortality risk after adjusting for known risk factors including advanced age, stroke, and cancer. ADL stages might aid clinical care planning and policy as a powerful prognostic indicator particularly of short-term mortality, improving on current ADL measures by profiling activity limitations of relevance to determining community support needs. J Am Geriatr Soc 60:485-492, 2012.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据