4.6 Article

Sustainability and Scalability of the Hospital Elder Life Program at a Community Hospital

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
卷 59, 期 2, 页码 359-365

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03243.x

关键词

delirium; Hospital Elder Life Program (HELP); intervention; prevention; hospital care; sustainability

资金

  1. National Institute on Aging [K24AG00949]
  2. Retirement Research Foundation [2007-225]
  3. Alzheimer's Association [IIRG-08-88737]
  4. Aging Brain Center, Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew Senior Life

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Hospital Elder Life Program (HELP), an effective intervention to prevent delirium in older hospitalized adults, has been successfully replicated in a community teaching hospital as a quality improvement project. This article reports on successfully sustaining the program over 7 years and expanding its scale from one to six inpatient units at the same hospital. The program currently serves more than 7,000 older patients annually and is accepted as the standard of care throughout the hospital. Innovations that enhanced scalability and widespread implementation included ensuring dedicated staffing for the program, local adaptations to streamline protocols, continuous recruitment of volunteers, and more-efficient data collection. Outcomes include a lower rate of incident delirium; shorter length of stay (LOS); greater satisfaction of patients, families, and nursing staff; and significantly lower costs for the hospital. The financial return of the program, estimated at more than $7.3 million per year during 2008, comprises cost savings from delirium prevention and revenue generated from freeing up hospital beds (shorter LOS of HELP patients with and without delirium). Delirium poses a major challenge for hospital quality of care, patient safety, Medicare no-pay conditions, and costs of hospital care for older persons. Faced with rising numbers of elderly patients, hospitals can use HELP to improve the quality and cost-effectiveness of care.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据