4.6 Article

Specific Subjective Memory Complaints in Older Persons May Indicate Poor Cognitive Function

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
卷 59, 期 9, 页码 1612-1617

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03543.x

关键词

memory complaints; cognitive function; aging

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [CA87969, AG15424]
  2. Yerby Postdoctoral Fellowship Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between the type and number of subjective memory complaints (SMCs) and performance on objective cognitive tests. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Nurses' Health Study. PARTICIPANTS: Sixteen thousand nine hundred sixty-four women (mean age 74) who provided information on SMCs. MEASUREMENTS: Telephone cognitive assessments and seven questions regarding SMCs were administered. Cognitive impairment was defined as a score of less than 31 on the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS) and below the 10th percentile on other cognitive measures. To assess associations with SMCs, multivariable logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios for cognitive impairment and multivariable linear regression to calculate mean differences in cognitive test scores, adjusting for age and depressive symptoms. RESULTS: Some SMCs, such as trouble following a group conversation or finding one's way around familiar streets, were more highly associated than others with odds of cognitive impairment. The complaint of forgetting things from one second to the next, generally considered part of normal aging, was not associated with cognitive impairment. In addition, there were strong, linear trends of increasingly worse scores on cognitive tests with increasing numbers of memory complaints. For each additional SMC endorsed, the odds of cognitive impairment increased approximately 20% when each SMC was weighted equally. CONCLUSION: SMCs are associated with objective cognitive status and may be considered by primary care physicians in determining whether follow-up is warranted. J Am Geriatr Soc 59: 1612-1617, 2011.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据