4.6 Article

Lifestyle Factors of People with Exceptional Longevity

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
卷 59, 期 8, 页码 1509-1512

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03498.x

关键词

longevity; lifestyle

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [RO1 AG-18728-01A1, RO1 AG024391, PO1 AG027734, RO1 AG7992]
  2. Einstein Nathan Shock Center of Excellence in Biology of Aging [P30]
  3. General Clinical Research Center at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine [MO1-RR12248]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES: To assess lifestyle factors including physical activity, smoking, alcohol consumption, and dietary habits in men and women with exceptional longevity. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A cohort of community-dwelling Ashkenazi Jewish individuals with exceptional longevity defined as survival and living independently at age 95 and older. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred seventy-seven individuals (mean 97.3 +/- 2.8, range 95-109; 74.6% women) and a subset of participants of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) I (n = 3,164) representing the same birth cohort as a comparison group. MEASUREMENTS: A trained interviewer administrated study questionnaires to collect information on lifestyle factors and collected data on anthropometry. RESULTS: People with exceptional longevity had similar mean body mass index (men, 25.4 +/- 2.8 kg/m(2) vs 25.6 +/- 4.0 kg/m(2), P = .63; women, 25.0 +/- 3.5 kg/m(2) vs 24.9 +/- 5.4 kg/m(2); P = .90) and a similar proportion of daily alcohol consumption (men, 23.9 vs 22.4, P = .77; women, 12.1 vs 11.3, P = .80), of regular physical activity (men: 43.1 vs 57.2; P = .07; women: 47.0 vs 44.1, P = .76), and of a low-calorie diet (men: 20.8 vs 21.1, P = .32; women: 27.3 vs 27.1, P = .14) as the NHANES I population. CONCLUSION: People with exceptional longevity are not distinct in terms of lifestyle factors from the general population, suggesting that people with exceptional longevity may interact with environmental factors differently than others. This requires further investigation. J Am Geriatr Soc 59:1509-1512, 2011.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据