4.6 Article

A Multifactorial Approach to Understanding Fall Risk in Older People

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
卷 58, 期 9, 页码 1679-1685

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03017.x

关键词

accidental falls; aged; activities of daily life; depression; Trails B; decision tree

资金

  1. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [400941, 350833]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE To identify the interrelationships and discriminatory value of a broad range of objectively measured explanatory risk factors for falls. DESIGN Prospective cohort study with 12-month follow-up period. SETTING Community sample. PARTICIPANTS Five hundred community-dwelling people aged 70 to 90. MEASUREMENTS All participants underwent assessments on medical, disability, physical, cognitive, and psychological measures. Fallers were defined as people who had at least one injurious fall or at least two noninjurious falls during a 12-month follow-up period. RESULTS Univariate regression analyses identified the following fall risk factors: disability, poor performance on physical tests, depressive symptoms, poor executive function, concern about falling, and previous falls. Classification and regression tree analysis revealed that balance-related impairments were critical predictors of falls. In those with good balance, disability and exercise levels influenced future fall risk-people in the lowest and the highest exercise tertiles were at greater risk. In those with impaired balance, different risk factors predicted greater fall risk-poor executive function, poor dynamic balance, and low exercise levels. Absolute risks for falls ranged from 11% in those with no risk factors to 54% in the highest-risk group. CONCLUSIONS A classification and regression tree approach highlighted interrelationships and discriminatory value of important explanatory fall risk factors. The information may prove useful in clinical settings to assist in tailoring interventions to maximize the potential benefit of falls prevention strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据