4.6 Article

Do Pedometers Increase Physical Activity in Sedentary Older Women? A Randomized Controlled Trial

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
卷 58, 期 11, 页码 2099-2106

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03127.x

关键词

randomized controlled trial; pedometer; physical activity; elderly

资金

  1. Scottish Executive Health Department [CZH/4/463]
  2. Chief Scientist Office [CZH/4/463] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Medical Research Council [G0900686] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. MRC [G0900686] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of a behavior change intervention (BCI) with or without a pedometer in increasing physical activity in sedentary older women. DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Primary care, City of Dundee, Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred four sedentary women aged 70 and older. INTERVENTIONS: Six months of BCI, BCI plus pedometer (pedometer plus), or usual care. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome: change in daily activity counts measured by accelerometry. Secondary outcomes: Short Physical Performance Battery, health-related quality of life, depression and anxiety, falls, and National Health Service resource use. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-nine of 204 (88%) women completed the 6-month trial. Withdrawals were highest from the BCI group (15/68) followed by the pedometer plus group (8/68) and then the control group (2/64). After adjustment for baseline differences, accelerometry counts increased significantly more in the BCI group at 3 months than in the control group (P = .002) and the pedometer plus group (P = .04). By 6 months, accelerometry counts in both intervention groups had fallen to levels that were no longer statistically significantly different from baseline. There were no significant changes in the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: The BCI was effective in objectively increasing physical activity in sedentary older women. Provision of a pedometer yielded no additional benefit in physical activity, but may have motivated participants to remain in the trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 58:2099-2106, 2010.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据