4.6 Article

Frontline Caregiver Daily Practices: A Comparison Study of Traditional Nursing Homes and The Green House Project Sites

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
卷 59, 期 1, 页码 126-131

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03209.x

关键词

Green House model; skilled nursing facility frontline caregiver daily practices; culture change in long-term care; Shahbaz and CNA comparison

资金

  1. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES To describe differences in frontline caregiver daily practice in two types of skilled nursing facility (SNF) settings, Green House (GH) homes and traditional SNF units, related to overall staffing (nursing and nonnursing departments), direct care and indirect care time per resident day, and staff time interacting with residents. DESIGN Observational, interview, and survey study comparing frontline caregiver daily practice in GH homes and traditional SNFs. SETTING Twenty-seven sites (GH homes and traditional SNF units). PARTICIPANTS Two hundred forty staff from participating sites. MEASUREMENTS Site and resident characteristics, nursing and nonnursing department staff hours per resident day (HPRDs), certified nursing assistant (CNA) direct and indirect care HPRDs, and CNA HPRDs engaged with residents. RESULTS Staffing from nursing and nonnursing departments combined, excluding administrative, was 0.3 less HPRDs (18 minutes) in GH homes than in traditional SNFs. CNAs in GH homes, although responsible for more nonnursing activities such as laundry and housekeeping, spent 0.4 more HPRDs (24 minutes) in direct care activities than CNAs in traditional SNFs. CONCLUSION The results challenge the assumption that staffing efficiencies cannot be achieved in small environments such as a GH home. Although the GH model has higher ratio of CNA staff to residents than traditional SNF units, overall staff time (combined total of nursing and nonnursing HPRDs) is slightly less in GH homes. The GH model allows for expanded responsibilities of CNAs in indirect care activities and more time in direct care activities and engaging directly with resident.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据