4.6 Article

Potentially Avoidable Hospitalizations of Nursing Home Residents: Frequency, Causes, and Costs

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
卷 58, 期 4, 页码 627-635

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02768.x

关键词

nursing homes; avoidable hospitalizations; transfers; quality

资金

  1. Georgia Medical Care Foundation (GMCF) [APP-PSS614]
  2. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to the Georgia Medical Care Foundation (GMCF) [APP-PSS614]
  3. QIO for the state of Georgia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES To examine the frequency and reasons for potentially avoidable hospitalizations of nursing home (NH) residents. DESIGN Medical records were reviewed as a component of a project designed to develop and pilot test clinical practice tools for reducing potentially avoidable hospitalization. SETTING NHs in Georgia. PARTICIPANTS In 10 NHs with high and 10 with low hospitalization rates, 10 hospitalizations were randomly selected, including long- and short-stay residents. MEASUREMENTS Ratings using a structured review by expert NH clinicians. RESULTS Of the 200 hospitalizations, 134 (67.0%) were rated as potentially avoidable. Panel members cited lack of on-site availability of primary care clinicians, inability to obtain timely laboratory tests and intravenous fluids, problems with quality of care in assessing acute changes, and uncertain benefits of hospitalization as causes of these potentially avoidable hospitalizations. CONCLUSION In this sample of NH residents, experienced long-term care clinicians commonly rated hospitalizations as potentially avoidable. Support for NH infrastructure, clinical practice and communication tools for health professionals, increased attention to reducing the frequency of medically futile care, and financial and other incentives for NHs and their affiliated hospitals are needed to improve care, reduce avoidable hospitalizations, and avoid unnecessary healthcare expenditures in this population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据