4.6 Article

Impact of Pressure Ulcers on Quality of Life in Older Patients: A Systematic Review

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
卷 57, 期 7, 页码 1175-1183

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02307.x

关键词

health-related quality of life; pressure ulcer; systematic review

资金

  1. Smith & Nephew Foundation, United Kingdom
  2. National Institute for Health Research [PDA/01/05/010] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES To identify the impact of pressure ulcers (PUs) and PU interventions on health-related quality of life (HRQL). DESIGN Systematic review and metasynthesis of primary research reporting the impact of PU and PU interventions on HRQL according to direct patient reports. Quality assessment criteria were developed and applied. Data extraction identified findings in the form of direct quotes from patients or questionnaire items and domain results. Combined synthesis of qualitative and quantitative research was performed using content analysis to generate categories and themes from findings. Thirteen electronic databases were searched, and hand searching, cross-referencing, contact with experts, and an online search was undertaken. No language restrictions were applied. SETTING Adults with PUs in acute, community, and long-term care settings across Europe, the United States, Asia, and Australia. PARTICIPANTS Thirty-one studies including 2,463 participants with PUs were included in the review. Ages ranged from 17 to 96. RESULTS The review included 10 qualitative and 21 quantitative studies; 293 findings, 46 categories, and 11 themes emerged. The 11 HRQL themes were physical impact, social impact, psychological effect, PU symptoms, general health, and other impacts of PUs: healthcare professional-client relationships, need for versus effect of interventions, impact on others, financial impact, perceived etiology, and need for knowledge. CONCLUSION There is evidence that PUs and PU interventions have a significant impact on HRQL and cause substantial burden to patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据