4.6 Article

The Vulnerable Elders-13 Survey Predicts 5-Year Functional Decline and Mortality Outcomes in Older Ambulatory Care Patients

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
卷 57, 期 11, 页码 2070-2076

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02497.x

关键词

vulnerable elder; functional decline; survival

资金

  1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [R21 HS017621-01]
  2. National Institute on Aging (NIA)-UCLA [K12 AG001004]
  3. Donald W. Reynolds Foundation
  4. University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Older Americans Independence Center (Pepper Center)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES To test the predictive properties of the Vulnerable Elders-13 Survey (VES-13) a short tool that predicts functional decline and mortality over a 1- to 2-year follow-up interval over a 5-year interval. DESIGN Longitudinal evaluation with mean follow-up of 4.5 years. SETTING Two managed-care organizations. PARTICIPANTS Six hundred forty-nine community-dwelling older adults (>= 75) enrolled in the Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders observational study who screened positive for symptoms of falls or fear of falling, bothersome urinary incontinence, or memory problems. MEASUREMENTS VES-13 score (range 1-10, higher score indicates worse prognosis), functional decline (decline in count of 5 activities of daily living or nursing home entry), and deaths. RESULTS Higher VES-13 scores were associated with greater predicted probability of death and decline in older patients over a mean observation period of 4.5 years. For each additional VES-13 point, the odds of the combined outcome of functional decline or death was 1.37 (95% confidence interval (CI)=1.25-1.50), and the area under the receiver operating curve was 0.75 (95% CI=0.71-0.80). In the Cox proportional hazards model predicting time to death, the hazard ratio was 1.23 (95% CI=1.19-1.27) per additional VES-13 point. CONCLUSION This study extends the utility of the VES-13 to clinical decisions that require longer-term prognostic estimates of functional status and survival.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据