4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Risk Factors for Preoperative and Postoperative Delirium in Elderly Patients with Hip Fracture

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
卷 57, 期 8, 页码 1354-1361

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02377.x

关键词

delirium; risk factors; BMI; hip fracture

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES To evaluate risk factors for preoperative and postoperative delirium. DESIGN Prospective cohort study. SETTING Departments of orthopedic surgery in two Norwegian hospitals. PARTICIPANTS Three hundred sixty-four patients with and without cognitive impairment, aged 65 and older. MEASUREMENTS Patients were screened daily for delirium using the Confusion Assessment Method. Established risk factors and risk factors regarded as clinically important according to expert opinion were explored in univariate analyses. Variables associated with the outcomes (P <.05) were entered into multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS Delirium was present in 50 of 237 (21.1%) assessable patients preoperatively, whereas 68 of 187 (36.4%) patients developed delirium postoperatively (incident delirium). Multivariate logistic regression identified four risk factors for preoperative delirium: cognitive impairment (adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=4.7, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.9-11.3), indoor injury (AOR=3.6, 95% CI=1.1-12.2), fever (AOR=3.4, 95% CI=1.5-7.7), and preoperative waiting time (AOR=1.05, 95% CI=1.0-1.1 per hour). Cognitive impairment (AOR=2.9, 95% CI=1.4-6.2), indoor injury (AOR=2.9, 95% CI=1.1-6.3), and body mass index (BMI) less than 20.0 (AOR=2.9, 95% CI=1.3-6.7) were independent and statistically significant risk factors for postoperative delirium. CONCLUSION Time from admission to operation is a risk factor for preoperative delirium, whereas low BMI is an important risk factor for postoperative delirium in hip fracture patients. Cognitive impairment and indoor injury are independent risk factors for preoperative and postoperative delirium.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据