4.6 Article

Stopping to Rest During a 400-Meter Walk and Incident Mobility Disability in Older Persons with Functional Limitations

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
卷 57, 期 2, 页码 260-265

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02097.x

关键词

mobility disability; aging; physical performance test

资金

  1. Cooperative Agreement with the National Institute on Aging (NIA) [UO1 AG022376]
  2. National Institutes of Health
  3. NIA [K24AG021507, AG024827, AG023641]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To examine the association between stopping to rest during a 400-m usual-pace walk test (400-MWT) and incident mobility disability in older persons with functional limitations. Prospective cohort study. Community based. Four hundred twenty-four participants in the Lifestyle Intervention and Independence for Elders Pilot (LIFE-P) Study aged 70 to 89 with functional limitations (summary score <= 9 on the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)) but able to complete the 400-MWT within 15 minutes. Rest stops during the 400-MWT were recorded. The onset of mobility disability, defined as being unable to complete the 400-MWT or taking more than 15 minutes to do so, was recorded at Months 6 and 12. Fifty-four (12.7%) participants rested during the 400-MWT at baseline, of whom 37.7% experienced mobility disability during follow-up, versus 8.6% of those not stopping to rest. Performing any rest stop was strongly associated with incident mobility disability at follow-up (odds ratio (OR)=5.4, 95% confidence interval (CI)=2.7-10.9) after adjustment for age, sex, and clinic site. This association was weaker, but remained statistically significant, after further adjusting for SPPB and time to complete the 400-MWT simultaneously (OR=2.6, 95% CI=1.2-5.9). Stopping to rest during the 400-MWT is strongly associated with incident mobility disability in nondisabled older persons with functional limitations. Given the prognostic value, rest stops should be recorded as part of the standard assessment protocol for the 400-MWT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据