4.6 Article

Cognitive Effects of Treating Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Alzheimer's Disease: A Randomized Controlled Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
卷 56, 期 11, 页码 2076-2081

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01934.x

关键词

dementia; Alzheimer's disease; obstructive sleep apnea; CPAP; cognitive impairment

资金

  1. NIH [M01 RR00827]
  2. NIA [AG08415, P50 AG05131, R01 AG028827]
  3. Research Service of the Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To examine whether treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) results in better cognitive function. Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Participants were randomized to therapeutic CPAP for 6 weeks or placebo CPAP for 3 weeks followed by therapeutic CPAP for 3 weeks. General clinical research center. Fifty-two men and women with mild to moderate AD and OSA. CPAP. A complete neuropsychological test battery was administered before treatment and at 3 and at 6 weeks. A comparison of subjects randomized to 3 weeks of therapeutic versus placebo CPAP suggested no significant improvements in cognition. A comparison of pre- and posttreatment neuropsychological test scores after 3 weeks of therapeutic CPAP in both groups showed a significant improvement in cognition. The study was underpowered to make definitive statements about improvements within specific cognitive constructs, although exploratory post hoc examination of change scores for individual tests suggested improvements in episodic verbal learning and memory and some aspects of executive functioning such as cognitive flexibility and mental processing speed. OSA may aggravate cognitive dysfunction in dementia and thus may be a reversible cause of cognitive loss in patients with AD. OSA treatment seems to improve some cognitive functioning. Clinicians who care for patients with AD should consider implementing CPAP treatment when OSA is present.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据