3.9 Article

Achieving the Salt Intake Target of 6 g/Day in the Current Food Supply in Free-Living Adults Using Two Dietary Education Strategies

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DIETETIC ASSOCIATION
卷 110, 期 5, 页码 763-767

出版社

AMER DIETETIC ASSOC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2010.02.006

关键词

-

资金

  1. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Human Nutrition

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There are national targets for salt intake of 6 g salt/day in Australia and the United States. Despite this, there is limited knowledge about the effectiveness of dietary education in reducing salt intake to this level. The objective of this study was to investigate whether dietary education enabled a reduction in salt consumption. In an 8-week parallel study, 49 healthy free-living adults were recruited from the Adelaide community by newspaper advertisement. In a randomized parallel design, participants received dietary education to choose foods identified by either Australia's National Heart Foundation Tick symbol or by the Food Standards Australia and New Zealand's low-salt guideline of 120 mg sodium/100 g food. Sodium excretion was assessed by 24-hour urinary sodium collections at baseline and weeks 4 and 8. Participants' experiences of following the education strategies were recorded by self-administered questionnaire. These data were collected between August and October 2008. Forty-three participants completed the study. After 8 weeks, urinary sodium excretion decreased from 121 +/- 50 to 106 +/- 47 mmo1/24 hours (7.3 +/- 3.0 to 6.4 +/- 2.8 g salt/24 hours) in the Tick group and from 132 +/- 44 to 98 +/- 50 mmo1/24 hours (7.9 +/- 2.6 to 6.0 +/- 3.0 g salt/24 hours) in the Food Standards Australia New Zealand group (P<0.05, with no between-group difference). Barriers to salt reduction were limited variety and food choice, difficulty when eating out, and increased time associated with identifying foods. In conclusion, dietary sodium reduction is possible among free-living individuals who received dietary advice. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010;110:763-767.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据