4.4 Article

Quantitative analysis of tooth surface loss associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease A longitudinal clinical study

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION
卷 143, 期 3, 页码 278-285

出版社

AMER DENTAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0153

关键词

Tooth wear; erosion; gastroesophageal reflux disease; acid reflux; optical scan

资金

  1. Oral Health Clinical Research Center, School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
  2. Frank Veden Endowment for Clinical Dental Research
  3. 3M Foundation, St. Paul, Minn

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Acid regurgitation resulting from gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) causes dissolution of tooth structure. The authors conducted a longitudinal clinical study to measure tooth surface loss associated with GERD. Methods. The authors made replicas of dental impressions obtained from 12 participants with GERD and six control participants at baseline and six months. Using an optical scanner, they digitized the tooth surfaces of these replicas. They then analyzed the volume of tooth surface loss and characterized it as noncontact erosion or erosion/attrition. Results. Mean (standard deviation) volume loss per tooth in participants with GERD (0.18 [0.12] cubic millimeter) was significantly higher than that in control participants (0.06 [0.03] min(3); t test; P < .013). Nine participants with GERD exhibited tooth surface loss with characteristics of erosion (noncontact erosion in three participants, erosion/attrition in eight participants). Conclusions. Tooth surface loss in participants with GERD was significantly greater than that in control participants. The pattern of surface loss was characteristic of erosion in noncontact areas and around contact areas. Clinical Implications. Anterior and posterior teeth of participants with GERD were affected by erosive tooth wear. In addition, the amount of erosive tooth wear on occlusal surfaces was twice as high when there was evidence of attrition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据