4.4 Article

Nonfluoride caries-preventive agents Executive summary of evidence-based clinical recommendations

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION
卷 142, 期 9, 页码 1065-1071

出版社

AMER DENTAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0329

关键词

Caries; xylitol; chlorhexidine; acidulated phosphate fluoride; evidence-based dentistry; clinical recommendations

资金

  1. BISCO, Schaumburg, Ill.
  2. Church and Dwight, Princeton, N.J.
  3. Dentsply, York, Pa.
  4. Health Resources and Services Administration, Rockville, Md.
  5. Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein
  6. National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, Bethesda, Md.
  7. 3M ESPE, St. Paul, Minn.
  8. Oral B, Cincinnati
  9. Philips, Andover, Mass.
  10. Procter & Gamble, Cincinnati

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. In this article, the authors present evidence-based clinical recommendations regarding the use of nonfluoride caries-preventive agents. The recommendations were developed by an expert panel convened by the American Dental Association (ADA) Council on Scientific Affairs. The panel addressed several questions regarding the efficacy of nonfluoride agents in reducing the incidence of caries and arresting or reversing the progression of caries. Types of Studies Reviewed. A panel of experts convened by the ADA Council on Scientific Affairs, in collaboration with ADA Division of Science staff, conducted a MEDLINE search to identify all randomized and nonrandomized clinical studies regarding the use of nonfluoride caries-preventive agents. Results. The panel reviewed evidence from 50 randomized controlled trials and 15 nonrandomized studies to assess the efficacy of various nonfluoride caries-preventive agents. Clinical Implications. The panel concluded that certain nonfluoride agents may provide some benefit as adjunctive therapies in children and adults at higher risk of developing caries. These recommendations are presented as a resource for dentists to consider in the clinical decision-making process. As part of the evidence-based approach to care, these clinical recommendations should be integrated with the practitioner's professional judgment and the patient's needs and preferences. (The full report can be accessed at http://ebd.ada.org/ClinicalRecommendations.aspx.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据