4.4 Article

A cross-sectional study evaluating chemiluminescence and autofluorescence in the detection of clinically innocuous precancerous and cancerous oral lesions

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION
卷 141, 期 2, 页码 151-156

出版社

AMER DENTAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0132

关键词

Oral cancer; dysplasia; oral cancer screening aids

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. ViziLite Plus with TBlue system (Zila Pharmaceuticals; now Zila, a division of Tolmar, Fort Collins, Colo.) and VELscope (LED Dental, White Rock, British Columbia, Canada) are oral cancer screening aids that have been developed to assist dentists in identifying precancerous and cancerous oral lesions. Methods. The authors screened patients with an overhead examination light and then with VELscope or ViziLite. Patients with a clinically innocuous lesion underwent a biopsy, and the authors compared the results of tissue pathological analysis with findings from the screening aid tests to determine the sensitivity and specificity of each device. The authors tested these devices to determine their ability tc aid in the decision-making process regarding whether further evaluation of a clinically innocuous lesion was required. Results. The authors biopsied 102 lesions and examined. them with the ViziLite. They found three dysplasias and one malignancy, none of which were detected with the ViziLite (sensitivity = 0 percent, confidence interval [CI] = 0-60.2 percent; specificity = 75.5 percent, CI = 66.7-82.8 percent). The authors biopsied another 156 lesions and Examined them with VELscope. They found 11 dysplasias and one malignancy, six of which were detected with VELscope (sensitivity = 50 percent, CI = 21.1-78.9 percent; specificity = 38.9 percent, CI = 30.8-46.9 percent). Conclusions. The study results indicate that use of ViziLite or VELscope along with a conventional screening examination for lesions deemed clinically innocuous was not beneficial in identifying dysplasia or cancer. Additional clinical studies are needed before the! e devices can be recommended. Clinical Implications. Clinicians and patients could have a false sense of security after obtaining a negative ViziLite or V El,scope examination result because potentially large numbers of precancerous and cancerous lesions will be missed by both devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据