4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

The First National Examination of Outcomes and Trends in Robotic Surgery in the United States

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS
卷 215, 期 1, 页码 107-114

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.02.005

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: There are few population-based data describing outcomes of robotic-assisted surgery. We compared outcomes of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and open surgery in a nationally representative population database. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database from October 2008 to December 2009 was performed. We identified the most common robotic procedures by ICD-9 procedure codes and grouped them into categories by procedure type. Multivariate analyses examined mortality, length of stay (LOS), and total hospital charges, adjusting for age, race, sex, Charlson comorbidity index, and teaching hospital status. RESULTS: A total of 368,239 patients were identified. On adjusted analysis, compared with open, robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery was associated with decreased odds of mortality (odds ratio = 0.1; 95% CI, 0.0-0.2; p < 0.001), decreased mean LOS (- 2.4 days; 95% CI, - 2.5 to 2.3; p < 0.001), and increased mean total charges in all procedures (range $ 3,852 to $ 15,329) except coronary artery bypass grafting (- $ 17,318; 95% CI, - 34,492 to - 143; p = 0.048) and valvuloplasty (not statistically significant). Compared with laparoscopic, robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery was associated with decreased odds of mortality (odds ratio = 0.1; 95% CI, 0.0 - 0.6; p = 0.008), decreased LOS overall (- 0.6 days; 95% CI, - 0.7 to - 0.5; p < 0.001), but increased LOS in prostatectomy and other kidney/bladder procedures (0.3 days; 95% CI, 0.1-0.4; p = 0.006; 0.8 days; 95% CI, 0.0-1.6; p = 0.049), and increased total charges ($ 1,309; 95% CI, 519-2,099; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Data suggest that, compared with open surgery, robotic-assisted surgery results in decreased LOS and diminished likelihood of death. However, these benefits are not as apparent when comparing robotic-assisted laparoscopic with nonrobotic laparoscopic procedures. (J Am Coll Surg 2012; 215: 107-116. (C) 2012 by the American College of Surgeons)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据