4.5 Article

Molecular Diagnosis of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS
卷 212, 期 6, 页码 1008-U240

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.02.024

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NIH, National Cancer Institute [CA090559]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) is an important prognostic factor in locally advanced rectal cancer. However, it is uncertain if histopathological techniques accurately detect pCR. We tested a novel molecular approach for detecting pCR and compared it with current histopathological approaches. STUDY DESIGN: Pretreatment tumor biopsies and surgical specimens were collected from 96 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant CRT and surgery. Tumor response was categorized by tumor regression grade. Tumor DNA from pre-CRT tumor biopsies was screened for K-ras and p53 mutations. DNA from paired surgical specimens was then screened for the same mutations using highly sensitive polymerase chain reaction-based techniques. RESULTS: Sixty-eight of 96 (71%) pretreatment biopsies harbored K-ras and/or p53 mutation; 36 (38%) had K-ras mutations, 52 (54%) had p53 mutations, and 20 (21%) carried both mutations. Of 70 patients with tumor regression grades 1 to 3, sixty-six (94%) had a concordant K-ras and p53 mutation profile in pre- and post-treatment tissues. Of 26 patients with tumor regression grade 0 (pCR), 12 had K-ras or p53 mutations in pretreatment biopsies. Of these, 2 (17%) patients had the same K-ras (n = 1) or p53 (n = 1) mutation detected in post-treatment tissue. CONCLUSIONS: Sensitive molecular techniques detect K-ras and p53 mutations in post-CRT surgical specimens in some patients with a pCR. This suggests histopathological techniques might not be completely accurate, and some patients diagnosed with a pCR to CRT might have occult cancers cells in their surgical specimens. (J Am Coll Surg 2011;212:1008-1017. (C) 2011 by the American College of Surgeons)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据