4.1 Article

Maternal Diet, C-Reactive Protein, and the Outcome of Pregnancy

期刊

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/07315724.2011.10719965

关键词

C-reactive protein; diet; preeclampsia; pregnancy; preterm delivery; small for gestational age

资金

  1. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [HD18269, HD38329]
  2. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [ES07437]
  3. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [DK 078865]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To examine the association of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), a systemic biomarker for the inflammatory process at entry to care, with pregnancy-induced hypertension/preeclampsia, adverse outcomes of pregnancy, and the maternal diet. Design: Random sample (N = 520) with normal glucose tolerance from a large prospective cohort study of urban, low income, minority gravidae. Results: During pregnancy, the highest tertile of hsCRP (range, 7.06-137.41 mg/L) was associated with significantly increased risks for early preterm delivery (<34 weeks). However, after stratification by maternal pregravid body mass index (BM:0, risk for early preterm delivery <34 weeks (adjusted odds ratios [AOR] = 3.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05-12.27), and pregnancy-induced hypertension (AOR = 2.66, 95% CI = 1.03-6.86) including preeclampsia (AOR = 2.72, 95% CI = 1.08-6.85) was shown to be specific to lean women (BMI <25) with high hsCRP. Increased hsCRP was unrelated to risk among overweight and obese gravidae. We found high hsCRP to be associated with diet. After stratification by BMI, dietary differences (higher intakes of protein and cholesterol with a lower intake of carbohydrate and a higher entry dietary glycemic index) were associated with increased hsCRP only among lean gravidae and not among those who were overweight or obese. Conclusions: High hsCRP is a diet-related biomarker for serious complications and poor outcome in lean women with normal glucose tolerance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据