4.7 Article

Ranolazine in High-Risk Patients With Implanted Cardioverter-Defibrillators The RAID Trial

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.086

关键词

implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; ranolazine; ventricular fibrillation; ventricular tachycardia

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute: Clinical Coordination Center [UO1 HL096607]
  2. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute: Data Coordination Center [UO1 HL096610]
  3. Gilead Sciences [IN-US-259-0125]
  4. Gilead Sciences
  5. Boston Scientific
  6. Biosense Webster
  7. Medtronic
  8. Zoll
  9. St. Jude Medical
  10. Boehringer Ingelheim
  11. Bayer
  12. BMS-Pfizer Alliance
  13. Medtronic Inc.
  14. Servier
  15. Spectranetics
  16. ARCA Biopharma
  17. Johnson Johnson
  18. Abbott
  19. Sanofi
  20. Allergan
  21. Philips
  22. Merit

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND Ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) remain a challenging problem in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). OBJECTIVES This study aimed to determine whether ranolazine administration decreases the likelihood of VT, VF, or death in patients with an ICD. METHODS This was double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial in which high-risk ICD patients with ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy were randomized to 1,000 mg ranolazine twice a day or placebo. The primary endpoint was VT or VF requiring appropriate ICD therapy or death, whichever occurred first. Pre-specified secondary endpoints included ICD shock for VT, VF, or death and recurrent VT or VF requiring ICD therapy. RESULTS Among 1,012 ICD patients (510 randomized to ranolazine and 502 to placebo) the mean age was 64 +/- 10 years and 18% were women. During 28 +/- 16 months of follow-up there were 372 (37%) patients with primary endpoint, 270 (27%) patients with VT or VF, and 148 (15%) deaths. The blinded study drug was discontinued in 199 (39.6%) patients receiving placebo and in 253 (49.6%) patients receiving ranolazine (p = 0.001). The hazard ratio for ranolazine versus placebo was 0.84 (95% confidence interval: 0.67 to 1.05; p = 0.117) for VT, VF, or death. In a pre-specified secondary analysis, patients randomized to ranolazine had a marginally significant lower risk of ICD therapies for recurrent VT or VF (hazard ratio: 0.70; 95% confidence interval: 0.51 to 0.96; p = 0.028). There were no other significant treatment effects in other pre-specified secondary analyses, which included individual components of the primary endpoint, inappropriate shocks, cardiac hospitalizations, and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS In high-risk ICD patients, treatment with ranolazine did not significantly reduce the incidence of the first VT or VF, or death. However, the study was underpowered to detect a difference in the primary endpoint. In pre specified secondary endpoint analyses, ranolazine administration was associated with a significant reduction in recurrent VT or VF requiring ICD therapy without evidence for increased mortality. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier on behalf of the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据